+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
dqw
  1. #1
    Working mkfotos's Avatar
    Member#
    48
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    CHS, SC, USA

    Default  .:Lens Review: Canon 400mm f/2.8 IS L:. mini review / Orioles vs Red Sox 8/10/07  
      
      

    So I got one of these a week or two ago... correction, I got two of these... but that's another story.

    Anyways, the Canon 400mm f/2.8 IS L is one remarkable piece of glass. It's heavy, large and unwieldy, but not as heavy, large, or unwieldy as the Sigma 300-800. With a 1.4X TC it becomes a 560mm f/4, and with a 2.0X TC it becomes a 800mm f/5.6. I was hoping that with the use of TC's, this lens would remain sharp, and give me similar range and framing flexibility as the Sigmonster. Long story short, when I tried the 400 with a 1.4X TC, it did just as good if not better than I expected, and possibly better than the 500 I just got rid of. I'll get around to reviewing the lens more in depth once I have my 2.0X TC back, but for now, and as late as it is, check out the below pics.

    These were taken tonight at the Orioles/Red Sox game. EXIFs should be intact, but here are the basics: handheld, 5D, ISO1600, 1.4X TC, minimal PP using DPP.

    Small imageshack versions:







    the bat actually shattered with this hit, notice the large splinter by the right forearm; this is more obvious in the original below



    Unresized originals:

    mkfotos.com/hosted/Orioles_vs_Red_Sox001.JPG
    mkfotos.com/hosted/Orioles_vs_Red_Sox002.JPG
    mkfotos.com/hosted/Orioles_vs_Red_Sox003.JPG
    mkfotos.com/hosted/Orioles_vs_Red_Sox004.JPG

    ...oh yeah, please don't hotlink to the images on my mkfotos site, all images are copyright me, all rights reserved, bla bla bla...


    • Advertising

      advertising
      newschoolofphotography.com
      has no influence on the ads
      that Google displays.



        
       

  2. #2
    Starving SanjuNana's Avatar
    Member#
    37
    Join Date
    Jul 2007

    Default  Re: Canon 400mm f/2.8 IS L mini review / Orioles vs Red Sox 8/10/07        

    I may have to see about renting one of those bad boys next time I need some extra length.

    Just curious, but what brand teleconverter were you using? Canon, Kenko?

  3. #3
    Working mkfotos's Avatar
    Member#
    48
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    CHS, SC, USA

    Default  Re: Canon 400mm f/2.8 IS L mini review / Orioles vs Red Sox 8/10/07        

    Quote Originally Posted by SanjuNana
    I may have to see about renting one of those bad boys next time I need some extra length.

    Just curious, but what brand teleconverter were you using? Canon, Kenko?
    I used the Canon 1.4X TC.

  4. #4
    cheesehead jacobsen1's Avatar
    Member#
    1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    41º64', 071º24'

    Default  Re: Canon 400mm f/2.8 IS L mini review / Orioles vs Red Sox 8/10/07        

    why'd you shoot with the 5D over the 1DmIII?
    I own this joint!
    gear list.
    yesterday is history, tomorrow a mystery, today is a gift, that's why it's called the present.

  5. #5
    Working mkfotos's Avatar
    Member#
    48
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    CHS, SC, USA

    Default  Re: Canon 400mm f/2.8 IS L mini review / Orioles vs Red Sox 8/10/07        

    Quote Originally Posted by jacobsen1
    why'd you shoot with the 5D over the 1DmIII?
    Because I'm hundreds of miles from home, and didn't think I'd need the MKIII while deployed :-[

    ...but I'll be going home this weekend, so I might grab the III and have another go at it.

    The lens performed superbly, and that's the main thing

+ Reply to Thread Go Back to forum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts