+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16
dqw
  1. #1
    Working Pakin's Avatar
    Member#
    322
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    PNW

    Default  C-17 Ride  
      
      

    Hello,

    This would be my first thread. I would like to share these photos. I have been browsing this site and it has been very enlightening despite a smaller community. I am NASIOC transplant and I don't think I would've bought a DSLR if it were not for the photog nuts there

    I recently aquired a new EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 lens, and these photos are the first ones I've taken. For one thing, it is my first IS lens and I would never thought I could handhold anything lower than 1/100. Awesome!

    The photos below are from an incentive ride that my AFROTC unit was offered by McChord AFB in Washington State. We flew with the 7th Airlift SQ., and they were a fun bunch to be with.

    Did a bunch of low level flying (the best part, never knew something that big could be THAT maneuverable) and in-air refueling, even dove at a 45 degree angle and felt weightless for a few seconds (camera was actually in the air). A very inspiring and exciting event for everybody.

    Here are a select few:















    More @
    http://pakin.smugmug.com/gallery/5061588_o5DFK


    As you can see, these photos at best are casual. However, when taking pictures in the cockpit, I absolutely could not get both the inside and the outside exposed at the right lighting conditions. Either have the background overexposed and the foreground right, or have the foreground underexposed and have the background right. I tried flash for the fore and focus on background, it helped a tad and the onboard flash is obstructed by the new lens now. Just wondering if there another way.

    All comments/suggestions/critique welcome.

    Thank you for looking.

    -phill


    • Advertising

      advertising
      newschoolofphotography.com
      has no influence on the ads
      that Google displays.



        
       

  2. #2
    antiCTLNLHIASDR ride5000's Avatar
    Member#
    151
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Providence, Rhode Island, United States

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by Pakin View Post
    Just wondering if there another way.
    the only other way to do it involves multiple exposures, one of which is taken for the highlights and another for the shadows.

    then the exposures are knit together either by manual masking and blending or by using a global contrast compressor (ie, tonemapper). the latter is what most people typically call "HDR" although both are viable methods of increasing the effective dynamic range.

  3. #3
    Pro user errors's Avatar
    Member#
    197
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Central NJ

    Default          

    Nice shots Phil, I like the lighting in the 4th one.
    Greg || Gear | Flickr

  4. #4
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by user errors View Post
    Nice shots Phil, I like the lighting in the 4th one.
    Ah me too! #4 definitely sticks out as my favorite, but #6 is good as well.

  5. #5
    Moderator distorto's Avatar
    Member#
    13
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Houston

    Default          

    great shots, and they even posed for you! must have been a lot of fun.
    one day, i will be an OG on this forum

    Jeremiah's flickr <---that's me.

  6. #6
    Working Pakin's Avatar
    Member#
    322
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    PNW

    Default          

    Thanks everyone!


    Quote Originally Posted by ride5000 View Post
    the only other way to do it involves multiple exposures, one of which is taken for the highlights and another for the shadows.

    then the exposures are knit together either by manual masking and blending or by using a global contrast compressor (ie, tonemapper). the latter is what most people typically call "HDR" although both are viable methods of increasing the effective dynamic range.
    Good info. And even better since there is a thread or two on NSOP. I'll be looking into that that. Thanks!

  7. #7
    got band-aids? iunno's Avatar
    Member#
    54
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    six feet under

    Default          

    awesome dude, welcome to the board!

  8. #8
    Working VicRSTi's Avatar
    Member#
    64
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bay Area

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by ride5000 View Post
    the only other way to do it involves multiple exposures, one of which is taken for the highlights and another for the shadows.

    then the exposures are knit together either by manual masking and blending or by using a global contrast compressor (ie, tonemapper). the latter is what most people typically call "HDR" although both are viable methods of increasing the effective dynamic range.
    How about an external flash instead of the built-in one? But instead of pointing it forward and have the lense obstruct it, bounce it up or behind you?

  9. #9
    Working tizzle's Avatar
    Member#
    42
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Bellingham, WA

    Default          

    Awesome dude. looks like fun, thanks for sharing.

  10. #10
    Pro Colorblinded's Avatar
    Member#
    15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    State of amusement

    Default          

    VicRSTi is correct, if you have an external flash your lens won't block, with proper control over exposure you should be able to balance the interior of the cockpit to the exterior to get what you want. That's how I would prefer to do it, rather than blending together different images however that certainly works as well if you want everything to line up perfectly though I imagine that would be tricky in the airplane.
    http://www.thecolorblindphotographer.com
    well maybe if I had a cape that gave me admin powers

  11. #11
    Worn out shutter PhatheadWRX's Avatar
    Member#
    358
    Join Date
    Apr 2008

    Default          

    I'm loving 4 and 6.

    Just be warned, taking HDRs is addicting
    - French - Site - Flickr - Gear -

  12. #12
    Working Pakin's Avatar
    Member#
    322
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    PNW

    Default          

    Yes, it seems a flash would work better in rougher conditions now that you mention it. The low level flying was shaky and there were times where the plane would be banking left and right; one second I would be staring at the ground, and at another I seeing blue. It would prove difficult to get three shots off AEB.

    Though thats more money, I'll probably keep looking at a used 430EX on craigslist. That 17-55 EF-S just sucked up all my stuff money. My 350D is growing bigger :/

  13. #13
    I'm awesome tardypizza's Avatar
    Member#
    3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    GO!!!!!!!

    Default          

    Freakin sweet shots!
    -ted

  14. #14
    Working Rock's Avatar
    Member#
    270
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Hiding in the bushes with a big, white lens.

    Default          

    Very nice shots.....

  15. #15
    Working
    Member#
    20
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Portland, OR

    Default          

    With the flash use a diffuser in the cockpit - flashes have fresnels in 'em to focus the light into a beam - too directional for what you are shooting.

  16. #16
    Working Pakin's Avatar
    Member#
    322
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    PNW

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by uncle_git View Post
    With the flash use a diffuser in the cockpit - flashes have fresnels in 'em to focus the light into a beam - too directional for what you are shooting.
    Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. Still flash shopping

+ Reply to Thread Go Back to forum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts