+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
dqw
  1. #1
    Starving
    Member#
    21
    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default  DrDrums <$400 lens thread  
      
      

    What about Sig 24-70 f/2.8? (fixed aperature)...
    http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/s...&cat=37&page=2

    DRum


    • Advertising

      advertising
      newschoolofphotography.com
      has no influence on the ads
      that Google displays.



        
       

  2. #2
    Pro Colorblinded's Avatar
    Member#
    15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    State of amusement

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by DrDRum View Post
    What about Sig 24-70 f/2.8? (fixed aperature)...
    http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/s...&cat=37&page=2

    DRum
    I have a Tokina 28-70 2.8 for Canon that I'd let go for less than half the price of that.
    http://www.thecolorblindphotographer.com
    well maybe if I had a cape that gave me admin powers

  3. #3
    Starving
    Member#
    21
    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default          

    Also a good one.
    I've been researchin' my scrot off...There's a ton of options out there for what I'm looking for in a next lense...

    A zoom portrait lense to compliment a 50mm/1.4.
    Sig 17 - 70
    Sig 24 - 70
    Tok 28 - 70
    Tok 28 - 80
    ect...it goes on and on...

    DRum

  4. #4
    Pro Colorblinded's Avatar
    Member#
    15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    State of amusement

    Default          

    Yeah the one i have isn't bad. Not stellar but pretty decent. 2.8 constant aperture, moderate focusing speed (but noisy) and a rotating front element but since I figure I'd sell it for around $150 it's not exactly like it'll be a bad deal.
    http://www.thecolorblindphotographer.com
    well maybe if I had a cape that gave me admin powers

  5. #5
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by DrDRum View Post
    Also a good one.
    I've been researchin' my scrot off...There's a ton of options out there for what I'm looking for in a next lense...

    A zoom portrait lense to compliment a 50mm/1.4.
    Sig 17 - 70
    Sig 24 - 70
    Tok 28 - 70
    Tok 28 - 80
    ect...it goes on and on...

    DRum
    Sigma 17-70. That thing rocks. But then again, I shot landscapes/nature with it (see website) so speed was a non-issue. A constant f/2.8 would probably be better for portrait type stuff.

  6. #6
    .:Visiting Timeout!:.
    Member#
    102
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston Tejas

    Default          

    NEW UPDATED GEAR LIST

  7. #7
    cheesehead jacobsen1's Avatar
    Member#
    1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    41º64', 071º24'

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by DrDRum View Post
    What about Sig 24-70 f/2.8? (fixed aperature)...
    I had and loved that lens until I upgraded to the L... It's sharper at 24mm than the L but the L wins at 70mm. That's to say optically it's an amazing lens IMHO. But it doesn't have HSM (sigma's version of USM, a fast silent AF motor) which could make it a PITA depending on what you're shooting... It was OK for me because I used it mostly for landscape/travel type stuff, and it is reasonably fast on a 1 series, but on the 5D it was a bit to slow (it's also very noisy).

    Constant f/2.8 and wonderful IQ.

    Maybe look at some of the other DC options and other third party digital only options that are constant f/2.8 AND have some version of USM/HSM?
    I own this joint!
    gear list.
    yesterday is history, tomorrow a mystery, today is a gift, that's why it's called the present.

  8. #8
    Working Berg's Avatar
    Member#
    52
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA

    Default          

    I have it and pretty satisfied with it. I'm very happy with it optically. As previously stated, it could benefit from HSM but hasn't been a problem with me. I am almost tempted to sell only to get something wider. With the 1.6x factor with my 300D, 24mm doesn't feel wide enough. I've been looking at the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 (I have a 70-200 f4L so I don't need a lens up to 70mm). If I didn't have the 70-200, there would be no thought of getting rid of it.

+ Reply to Thread Go Back to forum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts