+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 123
dqw
  1. #1
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default  Nikon D40 vs Canon 350D  
      
      

    My price range is pretty much limiting me to these two. In size, they are comparable, with the Canon being a little heavier. The obvious differences I am working on weighing out, but would like opinions on which is going to be most important. Some of it for me is just personal perference, and I will indicate that. As far as pros and cons, here we go:

    Nikon D40 Pros:
    Small and lightweight
    Larger sensor (unsure of performance difference)
    Has Auto ISO
    Larger built-in flash
    Better exposure compensation
    Unlimited JPEG at 2.5fps
    Longer self timer (which I will be using often)
    2.5" LCD
    230,000 pixel screen
    Uses SD cards (which I have)

    Nikon D40 Cons:
    6.0 effective MP
    More expensive than 350D kit
    Autofocus only with AF-S and AF-I lenses

    Canon 350D Pros:
    8.0 Effective MP
    Top LCD
    Less expensive
    Built in AF

    Canon 350D Cons:
    Uses Compact Flash?
    Smaller LCD
    115,000 pixel screen

    Please guys and gals, enlighten me on things I may not know about or have taken into consideration. I do not have a Canon or Nikon bias. I don't see the need for me to have an 8MP camera; I just don't see where I'll be taking shots and blowing them up big enough to require it. However, the IS is important to me, and if glass is going to cause a big price difference when I buy new lenses, PLEASE make me aware of how much that difference has potential to be.

    I do not intend on selling this camera at any point. If I ever move up from it, the camera will be handed down of sorts to my stepdad or my lil bro, but it will not be sold. My stepdad shoots a Minolta Maxxis film SLR and the thing takes crappy pictures.

    Now, here is what I'm going to be shooting:
    - Outdoor stills, single human subject and landscapes as well as sky shots
    - Indoor low light shots, human focus once again, B&W often as well
    - Outdoor night shots around Boston, probably dark areas with bright lit items like neon signs
    - Football, probably going back to Giants training camp in Albany, NY in summer
    - Outdoor very bright areas, such as the beach, multi and single human subject
    - Car, interior and exterior shots

    I am a photo n00b and am nervous about making the "wrong" decision. I have noticed the Nikon seems to be available with a different lens than the 18-55 as a kit from places like B&H. I plan on getting a 50 1.8 as I have read about but am unsure about the AF on it with the D40. If there's anything else I can add, please tell me and I will do my best.

    Thanks in advance,
    Chris

    P.S. I have $230 in my checking account and some room for a few hundred on my credit card. I really can't do anything over $550, with $600 being the absolute limit. Please take this into effect if you are suggesting another camera, the Pentax cameras had initially been on my list but I had to nix them. I think it's really down to these two.


    • Advertising

      advertising
      newschoolofphotography.com
      has no influence on the ads
      that Google displays.



        
       

  2. #2
    *spirit fingers* subimatt's Avatar
    Member#
    70
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Albany, NY

    Default          

    I shoot Canon, the XT is a great entry SLR. Play with both, see which feels better to you and buy it! both take great photos.

  3. #3
    cold-blooded internet insult machine Markitos's Avatar
    Member#
    74
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Durham, NC

    Default          

    They are comparable cameras--look at each system in its entirety, then make a decision based on that. It really (REALLY) comes down to personal preference--pick the one that feels/works best for you.

    They are like Honda and Toyota--they both make great products, but have very slightly different demographics.

    The difference between 6 and 8 mps is negligible, btw... they will both serve you fine... there's a thread you should check out, too... I'll go find it.
    “Sharpness is a Bourgeois concept.” -- Henri Cartier-Bresson

  4. #4
    cold-blooded internet insult machine Markitos's Avatar
    Member#
    74
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Durham, NC

    Default          

    Here, check this out.
    “Sharpness is a Bourgeois concept.” -- Henri Cartier-Bresson

  5. #5
    Pro BobbyT's Avatar
    Member#
    209
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Out of nowhere!

    Default          

    Given your shooting conditions I would lean towards the Xt as it will do better at high iso.

  6. #6
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    I'm telling you, Chris, Canon Rebel XT with 18-55 kit lens. You won't be disappointed in the slightest. In fact, you really can't make a wrong decision here, both cameras will be fine.

  7. #7
    cheesehead jacobsen1's Avatar
    Member#
    1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    41º64', 071º24'

    Default          

    this isn't aimed at you Chris, but should a thread like this be in "what to buy"?

    Also, don't consider CF cards a negative. They're the same price as a comparable SD card and they're much hardier. You can sit on them and they're fine where SD cards can be a bit more fussy/delicate. (I've broken 3 SD cards due to stupid random ****) But if you own SD cards I can understand that.

    I vote go try them out and pick on ergonomics. I have a preference, but it's because one layout make more sense to me. So I'm not going to share it.
    I own this joint!
    gear list.
    yesterday is history, tomorrow a mystery, today is a gift, that's why it's called the present.

  8. #8
    cold-blooded internet insult machine Markitos's Avatar
    Member#
    74
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Durham, NC

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by jacobsen1 View Post
    I have a preference, but it's because one layout make more sense to me. So I'm not going to share it.
    Ditto.
    “Sharpness is a Bourgeois concept.” -- Henri Cartier-Bresson

  9. #9
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by jacobsen1 View Post

    Also, don't consider CF cards a negative. They're the same price as a comparable SD card and they're much hardier.
    Totally agree with this. I watched my sister accidentally crack/snap an SD card a few months ago messing around with it.

    I've dropped my CF cards in creeks, climbed with them loose in my pockets, done all sorts of **** to 'em and they still work. A friend of mine actually washed one and it's fine too.

  10. #10
    Working
    Member#
    6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    SCIC

    Default          

    The D40 only has three AF points, as opposed to the 350D's seven AF points.
    To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.

  11. #11
    ken rockwell Geekybiker's Avatar
    Member#
    113
    Join Date
    Dec 2007

    Default          

    The 350D has DOF preview where the d40 does not.
    ɐıʇılıɯ xɐʇuəd
    Flickr

  12. #12
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by jacobsen1 View Post
    this isn't aimed at you Chris, but should a thread like this be in "what to buy"?

    Also, don't consider CF cards a negative. They're the same price as a comparable SD card and they're much hardier. You can sit on them and they're fine where SD cards can be a bit more fussy/delicate. (I've broken 3 SD cards due to stupid random ****) But if you own SD cards I can understand that.

    I vote go try them out and pick on ergonomics. I have a preference, but it's because one layout make more sense to me. So I'm not going to share it.
    Sorry Ben, I should've looked around and gotten more familiar with the board before posting I'm sure you can understand that I'm excited! I really can't put it off much longer, money or not, I'm buying, so it gets me really hopped up Thanks for moving it though!

    Quote Originally Posted by BCinMB View Post
    The D40 only has three AF points, as opposed to the 350D's seven AF points.
    My understanding isn't that great, but I'm guessing this means the Canon focuses on more areas while autofocusing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Geekybiker View Post
    The 350D has DOF preview where the d40 does not.
    I see. Does it seem like DOF preview is going to be something I'd use a lot?

  13. #13
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by wrxfactor View Post

    I see. Does it seem like DOF preview is going to be something I'd use a lot?
    Personally, I've never touched it outside of just playing with it to see if it would be useful to me.

  14. #14
    ken rockwell Geekybiker's Avatar
    Member#
    113
    Join Date
    Dec 2007

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by wrxfactor View Post
    My understanding isn't that great, but I'm guessing this means the Canon focuses on more areas while autofocusing?



    I see. Does it seem like DOF preview is going to be something I'd use a lot?
    AF points are where you'll (theoretically) get perfect focus. There is a sensor for each location. More AF points = more ways to compose your photo without recomposing (or taking good enough focus)

    As for DOF preview. Its not as important with a DSLR. Since you can just take a pic and chimp it to check DOF. However with it can be helpful. I originally learned with film it it was a big deal back then. However its still the only way to see exactly what you camera will see in the viewfinder.
    ɐıʇılıɯ xɐʇuəd
    Flickr

  15. #15
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    The more I read, the Canon seems the way I'm gonna go. Now I just need to figure out where to get it the cheapest. B&H is looking really good, but they have two kits. One has the typical 18-55 lens, and the other has a 28-90 lens. What's my better option here? Price is almost exactly the same.

  16. #16
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by wrxfactor View Post
    The more I read, the Canon seems the way I'm gonna go. Now I just need to figure out where to get it the cheapest. B&H is looking really good, but they have two kits. One has the typical 18-55 lens, and the other has a 28-90 lens. What's my better option here? Price is almost exactly the same.
    18-55 would be my choice for sure. Good wide-angle with a nice bit of mid-range. 28-90 wouldn't be wide enough nor long enough for me.

    Also, since you're saving a few bucks over your initial goal, you might consider picking up the Canon 50mm f/1.8 lens, it's a fantastic prime that will be a great tool for learning depth of field and working in low light.

    Also, if you're unsure, a prime means it's a fixed focal length lens (no zoom).

  17. #17
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by Stime187 View Post
    18-55 would be my choice for sure. Good wide-angle with a nice bit of mid-range. 28-90 wouldn't be wide enough nor long enough for me.

    Also, since you're saving a few bucks over your initial goal, you might consider picking up the Canon 50mm f/1.8 lens, it's a fantastic prime that will be a great tool for learning depth of field and working in low light.

    Also, if you're unsure, a prime means it's a fixed focal length lens (no zoom).
    Since there was no hyphen I assumed that it was fixed. I will definitely be getting that lens in the very near future if not with the camera. My brother has offered to loan me a good chunk of change but I feel bad taking it from him; he's 15. Hard to find reviews of the 28-90 but what I did find was mostly awful.

    Scott, talk to me about B&H's protection policy. Does an accidental drop get covered? I'll spend the extra money if so.

  18. #18
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by wrxfactor View Post
    Hard to find reviews of the 28-90 but what I did find was mostly awful.
    I've actually never even heard of it. That sends up a red flag with me pretty quick. Go for the 18-55, it's proven to be a good piece of glass when used correctly.

  19. #19
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by wrxfactor View Post

    Scott, talk to me about B&H's protection policy. Does an accidental drop get covered? I'll spend the extra money if so.
    No idea. I've never purchased any extra insurance or anything. And, I'd doubt any drops would be covered either way.

  20. #20
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Yeah, poking around on Adorama I found a refurbed Rebel XT 18-55 kit for 399.95, don't know if that makes it worth it though.

  21. #21
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    I'd go with this from Amazon:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0007QKN22

    $50 just isn't worth messing with anything refurbished in my opinion.

  22. #22
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Didn't realize Amazon was cheaper than B&H. Damn I just want to pull the trigger. I'm a big fan of saving money but I have no idea what refurbished entails, so I agree. $450 from Amazon isn't bad, I'm sure there's some kind of code I can dig up on SlickDeals that may help out as well.

  23. #23
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by wrxfactor View Post
    Didn't realize Amazon was cheaper than B&H. Damn I just want to pull the trigger. I'm a big fan of saving money but I have no idea what refurbished entails, so I agree. $450 from Amazon isn't bad, I'm sure there's some kind of code I can dig up on SlickDeals that may help out as well.
    Go for it if you can afford it, you won't be sorry. Does the kit come with a memory card? Make sure it does if not.

  24. #24
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by Stime187 View Post
    Go for it if you can afford it, you won't be sorry. Does the kit come with a memory card? Make sure it does if not.
    Doesn't look like it. For $25 more I can snatch a 2gig CF II SanDisk card though, so like 474.93 or something was my total.

  25. #25
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by wrxfactor View Post
    Doesn't look like it. For $25 more I can snatch a 2gig CF II SanDisk card though, so like 474.93 or something was my total.
    That'll be perfect.

  26. #26
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by Stime187 View Post
    That'll be perfect.
    What am I looking at for storage on that thing? My ex-gf had a 2gig MS Pro Duo for her Sony Cybershot and it held up to 2,000 photos in a certain mode, but 800 was easily doable. Just wanna know the headroom I'd have.

    ::edit:: Same card but 4 gigs is only 11 bucks more. I guess I can't complain if I stay under $500.
    Last edited by wrxfactor; 02-23-2008 at 03:28 PM.

  27. #27
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by wrxfactor View Post
    What am I looking at for storage on that thing? My ex-gf had a 2gig MS Pro Duo for her Sony Cybershot and it held up to 2,000 photos in a certain mode, but 800 was easily doable. Just wanna know the headroom I'd have.
    I'd say you're looking at around 300 (more if anything) shots per card at the highest JPEG setting.

  28. #28
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by Stime187 View Post
    I'd say you're looking at around 300 (more if anything) shots per card at the highest JPEG setting.
    Alrighty. I think I'm gonna end up with the 4gig card then. Looks like I can save $30 if I sign up for a credit card, so I think I'll be doing that as well. Too bad I can't save 15% like at Kohl's!

  29. #29
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Wow, scratch that, I was WAY off. I just checked my Rebel XT...

    At the highest JPEG setting (Large/Fine), you'll have ~580 shots on a 2GB card.

  30. #30
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Thanks for letting me know Scott. Does write speed suffer with larger cards? Luckily I have an external HD so wherever I go I would just be able to unload pics to it and wouldn't really have the need for a 4gig card spacewise.

  31. #31
    Hat Trick
    Member#
    53
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Some national park...

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by wrxfactor View Post
    Thanks for letting me know Scott. Does write speed suffer with larger cards? Luckily I have an external HD so wherever I go I would just be able to unload pics to it and wouldn't really have the need for a 4gig card spacewise.
    No idea. I've never even come close to needing to care about write speed. Judging by my CF cards, I seem to stick to Ultra II speed.

  32. #32
    ken rockwell Geekybiker's Avatar
    Member#
    113
    Join Date
    Dec 2007

    Default          

    doh nevermind that table messed up. The dpreview of the XT tells the file size for each quality level though.
    ɐıʇılıɯ xɐʇuəd
    Flickr

  33. #33
    Zero Hero jjswee's Avatar
    Member#
    98
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    California

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by Geekybiker View Post
    doh nevermind that table messed up.
    I saw that!


  34. #34
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Hey guys, just got back from Target. Held both the D40 and the 350D, and was much happier with the Canon. The Nikon felt better with both hands, but I will be doing a lot of one-hand shooting of myself and others, especially while I'm doing other things. The Nikon did feel solid in that aspect but there were just too many things getting in my way. The dial at the top right on the back was especially annoying.

    Holding the camera with the lens facing me, the Canon was handsdown the winner. I was disappointed that it didn't have power and the Nikon did, but what did I expect from Target?

    Anyways, Canon it is. I'm excited

  35. #35
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    It's been a while for me here; I've been struggling financially with no job and was going to get another CC just to put this on it. I'm still going that route I think, if I buy new, but I just found out the GF is going to need a dSLR for her Digital Photography class in Amsterdam this summer. She didn't budget for this so I'm just going to suck it up and buy the camera now and let her take it with her.

    I've been looking at used 350D's but don't know what lenses she may need on her trip. We have three Minolta Maxxum lenses, which is why I'm now considering one of the Sony dSLRs. Throw some suggestions my way! Used/new, and 350D or Sony package?

  36. #36
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          


  37. #37
    ken rockwell Geekybiker's Avatar
    Member#
    113
    Join Date
    Dec 2007

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by wrxfactor View Post
    Yah, don't buy stuff on credit you can't pay off immediately. :\ Sucks but its not worth it.
    ɐıʇılıɯ xɐʇuəd
    Flickr

  38. #38
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by Geekybiker View Post
    Yah, don't buy stuff on credit you can't pay off immediately. :\ Sucks but its not worth it.
    That's not the concern right now. The concern is getting the right camera for the money that gives my gf the best options for her class. Too bad the professor won't give any info on what she'll need for lenses.

  39. #39
    got band-aids? iunno's Avatar
    Member#
    54
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    six feet under

    Default          

    how about a k100d?

    they're dirt cheap!

  40. #40
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    How cheap is dirt cheap? I'd like to go Rebel or Rebel XT as it seems <400 is doable for body + kit lens and maybe a nifty fifty.

  41. #41
    got band-aids? iunno's Avatar
    Member#
    54
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    six feet under

    Default          

    well, the k100d's are floating around for $500 new with the kit lens. used you can pick them up for $400 EASY. they're all over dude. maybe check out pentaxforums.com if you are looking for a used one.

    if you want one used actually...i'd sell you mine as i'm looking to upgrade to the k10d.

    oh and the pentax k-mount lenses will work on ALL pentax dslr cameras, literally there's 30 years of lenses that will work with the modern dslr's

  42. #42
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Daniel, I don't have $500 to drop on a kit, honestly, and it wouldn't leave me in a good position anyways. I'm thinking used kit, or new body + some other lens. I was set on the 350D, and am only considering the Sony now because I have multiple other lenses she could take.

    - Chris

    P.S. I made that tortilla soup and it was ****ing bomb!

  43. #43
    got band-aids? iunno's Avatar
    Member#
    54
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    six feet under

    Default          

    oh word, ok dude.

    keep an eye on craigslist and i'll be on the lookout around the slick deals forum, k?

    i love tortilla soup!

    i actually made a pizza and chocolate chip cookies!

  44. #44
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Quote Originally Posted by b84wm View Post
    oh word, ok dude.

    keep an eye on craigslist and i'll be on the lookout around the slick deals forum, k?

    i love tortilla soup!

    i actually made a pizza and chocolate chip cookies!
    I use Opera and the SDF is one of my 9 speed dials. NASIOC, FB, Gmail, NSOP are the other main ones I click on, so I'll be looking on SDF as well. I wish I had gotten to Staples or Circuit City or whoever had the Sony kit for $330 :-(

  45. #45
    got band-aids? iunno's Avatar
    Member#
    54
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    six feet under

    Default          



    word.

  46. #46
    ken rockwell Geekybiker's Avatar
    Member#
    113
    Join Date
    Dec 2007

    Default          

    Honestly, I would just to the cheapest SLR you can get, and still stick to the line of lenses you eventually want. Bodies, especially low end bodies are cheap. Glass isn't so cheap and will follow you through whatever system you choose. That said, Pentax, with its k-mount system will give you the biggest pool of cheap glass (since it can use really really old MF lenses)
    ɐıʇılıɯ xɐʇuəd
    Flickr

  47. #47
    ken rockwell Geekybiker's Avatar
    Member#
    113
    Join Date
    Dec 2007

    Default          

    ɐıʇılıɯ xɐʇuəd
    Flickr

  48. #48
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    I found a used Nikon D100 for $300 on craigslist, seems to be similar to the digital Rebel. Ahhh I don't know what to do; I shouldn't be doing this at night.

    ::edit:: I should mention I will only buy something local I can touch and leave with after I pay. If it was for me only, fine, but this is imperative for her class and I can't have ANY issues.

  49. #49
    ken rockwell Geekybiker's Avatar
    Member#
    113
    Join Date
    Dec 2007

    Default          

    I'd keep talking to Danielle about his k100....
    Last edited by Geekybiker; 04-17-2008 at 12:38 PM.
    ɐıʇılıɯ xɐʇuəd
    Flickr

  50. #50
    digital fart wrxfactor's Avatar
    Member#
    266
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NESIC

    Default          

    Daniel, PM me some details.

+ Reply to Thread Go Back to forum
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts